B1nary
New member
What about something like that?
![]()
This looks awesome
What about something like that?
![]()
[MENTION=289]Jan[/MENTION]
My insert image button doesn't have an option to upload images anymore. Just to specify a url.
I think all these amateur logo designers broke it!![]()
[MENTION=289]Jan[/MENTION]
My insert image button doesn't have an option to upload images anymore. Just to specify a url.
I think all these amateur logo designers broke it!![]()
ooh this is nice but i agree with everyone else that the ghost should not be red.What about something like that?
![]()
Noooooo!
Mine works in this thread and in Threadkiller. Where did you try to post an image? Try clearing cookies. If nothing else works, let me know which ISP and I'll get my tech to investigate along with that weird issue he's looking into from this morning.
Why does everyone keep using that weird font? It's very difficult to reproduce (for print environments) and it will be difficult to read when scaled down to smaller sizes. It's already too difficult to read at normal sizes... There's a reason companies with iconic, easily recognisable logos stick to simple, legible fonts.
I think the font of which you speak is more 'legible' than this:
![]()
You can't compare a modern, tech-oriented logo against a logo that was created more than 100 years ago that followed a specific style that was prevalent to that age. Have a look at logos like Gamespot, IGN, Polygon, PC Gamer, Games Radar, Eurogamer, Metacritic, etc... Notice a trend in the font usage?
I've been through the whole "fun font for a trendy vibe" phase in my younger years and, running my own business now for 2 years, I realised you need something you can easily reproduce that's legible in various sizes. More often than not a simple, clean logo is more recognisable than an over-complex one with numerous design motifs and fancy fonts.
It's not about deterring new customers, it's about GAINING them. You won't chase customers away, but it might make the process of reaching and acquiring them unnecessarily difficult.Phew! Gave me the whole megillah. I will just summarize what you said "Too much going on, it might deter possible new customers, it would be wiser to use a simple font."
I agree that logos should be fit for purpose and that they should address their target market. What you should be wary of is coming across as amateurish. You can still make a logo appear fun and whimsical by altering a standard, modern font just slightly and integrating a motif or emblem to represent your brand. Negative space can also be used evoke a sense of mystery and cleverness by creating implied shapes, figures or even letters. FedEx is a textbook example with the arrow formed in the negative space between the "E" and "x", implying a sense of movement.If the gaps in the "g's" and "a" were closed it wouldn't be 'over-complex' ,problem solved, it would still be legible. It wasn't in its original state. I do think that if something is slightly unusual it draws more attention, it draws my attention ( no not referring to something completely illegible). Depending on the company, a font should represent the company. So something 'fun' and 'lively might not be what a Law firm would want to use. It would appear as if something "fun' and ' lively' is what the administration had in mind.
Sadly so. I honestly believe MyGaming can have a much better logo than the current or suggested ones. It has the potential to take on a global market by implementing a custom CMS and integrating community activities more closely into featured content, seeing that the current management and staff are so dedicated to the cause. Great sites are built using great technology and open-source CMSs and forums can only take you so far.Though , judging by the poll, the second option is in the lead so our difference of opinions about this particular font is probably futile. "whistling:
*sigh*
My wife tells me to stop lecturing to the internet now, so that's what I'll do.
^ I like!i still vote for keeping the current one (to match my tee's and caps) but just in case ....
![]()
mockup
![]()