Nvidia 3D Vision Poll - This is actually important

Would you buy Nvidia 3D Vision Kits if they were supplied locally?

  • YES! - I've been holding out because importing is too expensive

    Votes: 15 46.9%
  • NO! - I'm aware of what 3D Vision is, but I really don't care.

    Votes: 17 53.1%
  • NO! - I don't care about local suppliers, I'll pay the extra money and use importers.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    32

Neo

New member
If local hardware suppliers like Rectron or Frontosa would bring in Nvidia 3D Vision Kits and started supplying the compatible LCD monitors at reasonable prices, would you consider purchasing the hardware?
 
I would not buy the 3D glasses. Too expensive and not a necessity.

Haven't gotten on this whole 3D thing. Will probably only get 3D in couple of years. That's for me personally.
 
I just feel sort of sad because a whole bunch of PC gamers in this country are missing out on something spectacular and it's like they're either not even aware of it, or worse, they simply don't care. No wonder gaming is moving to consoles. PC gamers are a bit of a slacker crowd by the looks of things.
 
Make the poll less specific, like 3D capable monitors, the different 3D glasses, ie. 3D gaming hardware =)
I wouldn't specifically buy the 3D vision kit, as I don't have a NVidia card at the moment, but since I ordered some 3D kit from overseas, it would be a definite yes for 3D hardware.
 
I am on Neo with this one..We in SA need to wake up and see what we are missing. I picked this trend up when i went for Eyefinity and now the same for Nvidia 3d vision. So wish some local importers would offer it as a option
 
3d is nice, but I'm not interested in swapping my crossfired 5870s for an nvidia card, atm. Especially since I could never afford 2 X GTX480s...
 
I personally wouldn't switch to 3D Nerd-o-Vision even if it was locally available
Splitting headaches and even less chance of female company would result in the extinction of our species
 
3D is a huge waste of money IMO. You have to have a special screen which can handle 120hz and expensive glasses. Never mind the fact that you need to have a pc that can run double the FPS that you actually want to view it at. Also if you go for the cheap option you game looks like crap...
 
3D is a huge waste of money IMO. You have to have a special screen which can handle 120hz and expensive glasses. Never mind the fact that you need to have a pc that can run double the FPS that you actually want to view it at. Also if you go for the cheap option you game looks like crap...

I think it would be unwise to call it a "waste of money". The thing, the technology is rather special. It's like saying that console gaming is a waste of money because you need to pay for the console, controllers, games and then an expensive flatpanel TV to make it worth while. When it comes to technology of any kind lately, it's not clever to bring "price" in as a valid argument.

But, whilst 3D won't be for everyone, I seriously recommend that you try it when you can first before making up your mind.
 
To expansive. The 3d renders the picture twice and you need a monster machine to run it properly. People can't afford to upgrade just for 3d vision.
 
It is too expensive. It seems a waste. Why is bringing price into this not clever? Price has to be brought in, otherwise it does not always make sense. People buy kit according to what they are able to spend. If someone cannot afford it, then its a simple decision for them.

I just think 3d is a waste(probably because I wont be able to view it properly), but it just does not seem like its worth it.
 
Well by those arguments you should also state that upgrading to an i7 CPU when you already have a dual core CPU is utter nonsense, or upgrading your graphics card to a GTX480 is ludicrous because you already have a 8800GT.

I may be totally wrong about this, but 3D gaming is going to be pushed HARD from this year on. Sooner or later you're going to see a lot of people buying this kit.

What some of you guys don't realize is that a lot of people who are hardcore PC gamers won't mind spending R7000 on upgrading a few pieces of hardware. PC gamers are much more willing to spend money on their rigs. Unlike console gamers who'll never understand why.

So honestly. R7000 is NOT a lot of money for this stuff. A single GTX480 costs almost the same, and the latest Intel CPU clocks in at over R10,000 - JUST FOR THE CPU.

If you're then going to say that consoles don't cost that much, then you're probably gaming on a tiny 32" LCD and you're not getting the full experience of that platform either.
 
To expansive. The 3d renders the picture twice and you need a monster machine to run it properly. People can't afford to upgrade just for 3d vision.

This kind of technology has never been designed to be adopted by "people". That's why you still get cavemen and cave-women who refuse to learn how to use a computer. This technology is for enthusiasts, rather than people, who actually understand and appreciate the technology, and enthusiasts have never been shy to spend money on their PC's.
 
This kind of technology has never been designed to be adopted by "people". That's why you still get cavemen and cave-women who refuse to learn how to use a computer. This technology is for enthusiasts, rather than people, who actually understand and appreciate the technology, and enthusiasts have never been shy to spend money on their PC's.

I wear glasses and I do enjoy technology but for me to wear another set of glasses over my set just puts me off.
 
I'm not really concerned about it. The amount of money one needs to spend just for some 3D effects is not worth it atm. Think about it, you will need a very fast GPU, a fast CPU to feed that GPU, a 3d compliant screen and you still need to fork out for the glasses. I can't think of much bigger wastes of money. Eventually technology will catch up and it won't be in the niche price bracket anymore. Perhaps then I'd consider it.
 
Last edited:
too many peripherals is a burden imo ... however when the technology gets to a stage (which will be soon) when 3D glasses are not required and LCD handles everything then maybe i would go for it ... but right now at the moment nope and a major factor is probably price since im not a hardcore gamer ...
 
Back
Top