In November of 2006,
DICE introduced
Battlefield 2... And it was a great game (proud of of legitimate copy

)...
6 years on... And they introduced its successor, which is now hugely popular among the masses of gamers.
In a six year gap, they've really made an ENORMOUS change in how we (the player/s) are experiencing FPSs.
Having said that; I feel that... Given the technology we have in this day and age, another
Battlefield in the series, in a 3 span should suffice. However, given another 5 years,
Battlefield 4 should have a greater stance, greater definition and a lot more immersive than its current predecessor.
EA really shouldn't fall into the same pit
Activision have so lovingly run towards. I would hate to see Battlefield going down the same path as
Call of Duty has. IMO.