Harry Potter Deathly Hallows Part 2: Opinions?

The first films rocked! They were just so much fun to watch! :D

And as much as I might not think the latest ones were brilliant... I still want the full boxset on bluray when it comes out :love: I can't explain why ^^
 
I thought Voldemort's Death was a bit anticlimactic. This is only a minor detail however and I thought the movie did live up to the hype!
 
I have to admit, it wasn't the best movie in the series, but after all, it was Harry Potter. None of the movies except the first two were actually good movies, they were merely Harry Potter movies.

One thing that really irked me, though, was that Voldemort turned to ash when he died. I mean lolwtf. This isn't 30 Days of Night with vampires turning into ash. Even after all he'd gone through, he was still a human. His death left a corpse behind in the book, it really should have done the same in the movie.
 
I'll admit, I've never read the books. I only watched the movies and yes, there are some things I didn't understand until I looked it up on wikipedia - but I enjoyed the movies overall. HPatDH Part 2 reminds me a bit of LotR:ROKK. It just jumps into the midst of things and continues from where the previous one left off. It did make me feel kinda sad tho at the end. Been watching these movies for almost half my life!
 
uEsv8.jpg
 
You're the noob that went to see it in 3D :p

saw it today and made a point to go 2D. imho it was win for what it was and I actually enjoyed it. No movie if you are realistic about it will be a 1:1 representation. I did read last 3 books and saw no harm in the adaptation and I thought that the "end flick" was done a lot better some some of the potter movies in the flick-series.

Would you sit through a 9 hour flick to have a more realistic adaptation ?

:edit
Go see priest and then you will know what a shitty adaptation that was in relation to the actual manhwa. The flick had 100% nothing to do with what priest actually was and is. Now that was a terrible movie all in all.


Went to watch it last night and my overall opinion can be summed up with one word, meh. It's not that it was bad or not enjoyable, it just wasn't at all remarkable.

After 10 years of waiting for the finale, it felt very anti-climatic. Yes, I'd read the books before watching the movies, but even so, I felt cheated. It also felt very rushed. Almost as if some very important scenes were cut short to fit into the allotted time. Now I know the movie was already split into two parts and three parts would have been silly, but I feel not enough time was given to scenes that needed it.

And then the scenes that could have been shown dramatically and visually, like for instance the break-out of Gringotts Bank were such a let down. There was no flair or pizazz. No wow factor. Do not get me started on the 3D aspect of the movie. What a waste of time and money. There were maybe 5 times that you really noticed the 3D effects. The rest of the time I was just annoyed by the damn glasses or the fact that some scenes seemed to almost be out of focus. I really think 3D is overrated and if I had the choice, I would rather watch the movie in 2D, but sadly my regular cinema complex doesn't offer both option as they have limited cinemas.

On a side note, I still love Ster-Kinekor's love nest seats, just a pity I had to sit next to a dude smelling like a brewery!
 
Last edited:
Did not even know there was another movie out for Harry Potter. I stopped after the second movie cause I was bored of watching it.

Is this one any better than the first 2 movies in graphics and storyline?
 
What a crap movie. Seriously..

My mate and I watched all the movies on the big screen. Deathly Hallows Part 1 was a load of crap. This one was MEH. Ending was so... anti climatic.
 
Precisely. I'm not saying it was bad or a bad book to movie conversion, it just felt very disjointed and EXTREMELY dull end after all that hype.
 
I sense too much expectation.


Sent from the MyGaming iPhone App

Think about it. You read the books. Doesn't it seem as if there should've been just a tad more action/excitement to it? Hell, the final duel, really. Blue and red lines and then zap. V is a pile of dust. Pfft. Boring.
 
Think about it. You read the books. Doesn't it seem as if there should've been just a tad more action/excitement to it? Hell, the final duel, really. Blue and red lines and then zap. V is a pile of dust. Pfft. Boring.

Well that was not 300 or the matrix or borne identity. It's a "young adult" movie anyways :rolleyes:. Still a lot better than Priest and imho not so bad potter if not better than few others in the collection. Besides these are "wizards" not kungfu-jedi-masters, they are armed with a wand lol. Suppose you wanted fireballs, lighting storms and some demons dogs ?
 
Well that was not 300 or the matrix or borne identity. It's a "young adult" movie anyways :rolleyes:. Still a lot better than Priest and imho not so bad potter if not better than few others in the collection. Besides these are "wizards" not kungfu-jedi-masters, they are armed with a wand lol. Suppose you wanted fireballs, lighting storms and some demons dogs ?
have you read the books Pr⊕phet?
 
have you read the books Pr⊕phet?
Yes, but unlike you and den I didn't except a 1 to 1 adaptation of the story with 300 like fight scenes. The movies are the movies and the books are the books, is this so hard to grasp ?

Seriously wizards with wands for magic devices is not going to gief anything but average fight scenes. Even Gandalf and that other saruman's battle is laughable.

If you want fight scenes then go lookup a proper fighting flick or AAA then go and see an AAA flick :rolleyes:

:edit
jeez darknight rises was kak flick I mean where is the deep philosophical content or the lack of artistic flair and drama ?
 
Last edited:
Yes, but unlike you and den I didn't except a 1 to 1 adaptation of the story with 300 like fight scenes. The movies are the movies and the books are the books, is this so hard to grasp ?

Seriously wizards with wands for magic devices is not going to gief anything but average fight scenes. Even Gandalf and that other saruman's battle is laughable.

If you want fight scenes then go lookup a proper fighting flick or AAA then go and see an AAA flick :rolleyes:
I was not expecting epic fight scenes, I was expecting to see characters I read about come to life, I was expecting the same humour I read in the books, instead I got some Hollywood trash...
 
I was not expecting epic fight scenes, I was expecting to see characters I read about come to life, I was expecting the same humour I read in the books, instead I got some Hollywood trash...

Then you fail.

I've pointed this out before: No movie is going to give you 100% 1 to 1 adaptation. Even lord of the rings was changed to "fit" the silver screen.

Movies that comes from hollywood tends to be hollywoodish, why do you think good old george lucas didn't go hollywood with the the star wars flicks back in 1977 ?
 
Last edited:
Then you fail.

I've pointed this out before: No movie is going to give you 100% 1 to 1 adaptation. Even lord of the rings was changed to "fit" the silver screen.

Movies that comes from hollywood tends to be hollywoodish, why do you think good old george lucas didn't go hollywood with the the star wars flicks back in 1977 ?
Ja Learnt my lesson a long time ago, thats why I try and read the books after watching the movie, for example Song of Fire and Ice
 
Ja Learnt my lesson a long time ago, thats why I try and read the books after watching the movie, for example Song of Fire and Ice

I've yet to read girl with a dragon tatoo books however I really thought that the movies (not the coming Hollywood ones, the swedish originals) was fucking brilliant to say the least. It's not a child tale, but imho one of the best crime and investigation tales I've seen in a long while.

On the flip side You have this "perfect picture" in your head about the game, the book or the comic. Do you think this can be translated by someone else into a film without having some fail ?

If you've ever read the original star wars books that ep 4,5 and 6 was based on you'd also know that even GL skimped somethings out as for example how vader sums up luke in his head which actually would have added to the film, but did you really want to hear vader's voices in his head while looking at the scene ?

One of the most difficult adaptations is dune, many have tried and many have 'died' doing it. There are only two versions of film currently and both are far from perfect, but that doesn't mean they can't be enjoyed for what they are or how they try to tell the story.
 
If you've ever read the original star wars books that ep 4,5 and 6 was based on you'd also know that even GL skimped somethings out as for example how vader sums up luke in his head which actually would have added to the film, but did you really want to hear vader's voices in his head while looking at the scene ?

Star Wars wsa based on books? I thought all the books came after the movies? More info please!
 
Back
Top