Not sure how they can call it gorgeous. Maybe they have been drinking too much of the Activision kool-aid. Sure it's passable and maybe a decent compromise to get 60FPS on old ass hardware but it isn't gorgeous.
Dated as hell, but hey as long as the sheep keep on buying the same thing over and over there's no reason for them to progress is there?
Any word on if we're actually getting dedicated servers? That is pretty much make or break at the moment.
Treyarch have kept no secrets about the fact that the developer is using a seven-year old engine to power the upcoming Call of Duty: Black Ops II; and along with that came a lot of criticism, but the developers don’t really understand why.
Although the engine is showing its age, they are absolutely correct, guys love the fast and smooth nature of cod, something that is lacking in pretty much all modern fps multiplayer games, BF3 being a prime example, although BF3 looks gorgeous...its plays bad always feels slow and stuttery, no matter what machine you're running and at what settings you play at.
Dated as hell, but hey as long as the sheep keep on buying the same thing over and over there's no reason for them to progress is there?
Then are pretty much as stupid as I thought.
Any time someone has to put down another game just so they can try and feel better about their game of choice just makes me automatically disregard anything that had to say in the first place.Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah (Call of Duty) blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah (Battlefield 3).
Any time someone has to put down another game just so they can try and feel better about their game of choice just makes me automatically disregard anything that had to say in the first place.
There are more games than Battlefield and Call of Duty, as much as EA and Activision would like you to think otherwise, so stop constantly referencing one when talking about the other.
Any time someone has to put down another game just so they can try and feel better about their game of choice just makes me automatically disregard anything that had to say in the first place.
There are more games than Battlefield and Call of Duty, as much as EA and Activision would like you to think otherwise, so stop constantly referencing one when talking about the other.
I'm always astounded when people want to pull the 'CoD doesn't innovate' card. No, really, I am.
It's a military FPS ffs. What the hell is it supposed to innovate? You point at an enemy, and you shoot.
Please name one First Person Multiplayer title that is played as much as COD and or BF3 locally?
It still plays smoother than any other engine out there and that's what really matters.
That's why they have kept using it. I also think this will be the last time they use the engine and from the vids I have watched it looks perfectly fine. It also looks nothing like the original engine from 2005, not even close to that.
Tell me that doesn't look good? and im not just talking game play I am talking about the graphics.
EDIT: I almost forgot to mention that Black Ops II will be emphasizing 'community' and 'e-sports' this year, tell me this isn't innovation!