Reportedly based on a fully unlocked but slightly downclocked Fiji XT, the same GPU that powers the impressive Radeon R9 Fury X, we’ve suspected for some time now that AMD’s 6 inch (approximately 15 centimetres) Radeon R9 Nano would be the most powerful mini-ITX GPU around.
It’s hard to see how any other card of its type could compete with 4096 stream processors, 256 texture units, 64 raster operations pipelines and a 4096-bit memory interface. After all, a bus that wide, in tandem with 4GB of high-bandwidth running at 1 GHZ, means 512GB/s of bandwidth.
Just for comparison, NVIDIA’s fastest mini-ITX card is based on the GTX 970, a fantastic card to be sure, but only capable of a little under 224GB/s of bandwidth. It’s no match for the Fiji XT, let’s put it that way.
Now, fortunately, thanks to the Chinese website iyd.kr, we’ve seen the R9 Nano in the wild, as it’s apparently ready for distribution to its selected partners.
Many are pinning the R9 Nano’s frequency at between 830 MHz and 900 MHz, as opposed to the Fury X’s 1050 MHz, but the R9 Nano is still going to be a phenomenal performer.
WCCF Tech suggests 890 MHz:
| Category |
Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon R9 Fury | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU | Fiji XT | Fiji XT (TBC) | Fiji Pro | Hawaii XT |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | 4096 (TBC) | 3584 | 2816 |
| GCN Compute Units | 64 | 64 (TBC) | 56 | 44 |
| Render Output Units | 64 | 64 (TBC) | 64 | 64 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 256 | 256 (TBC) | 224 | 176 |
| GPU Frequency | 1050Mhz | 890Mhz (TBC) | 1000 MHz | 1000Mhz |
| Memory | 4GB HBM | 4GB HBM | 4GB HBM | 4GB GDDR5 |
| Memory Interface | 4096bit | 4096bit | 4096bit | 512bit |
| Memory Frequency | 500Mhz | 500Mhz | 500Mhz | 1250Mhz |
| Effective Memory Speed | 1Gbps | 1Gbps | 1Gbps | 5Gbps |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512GB/s | 512GB/s | 512GB/s | 320GB/s |
| Cooling | Liquid, 120mm Radiator | Air, Single Axial Fan | Air, Custom AIB Solutions | Air, Single Blower Fan |
| Performance (SPFP) | 8.6 TFLOPS | 7.3 TFLOPS (TBC) | 7.2 TFLOPS | 5.6 TFLOPS |
| TDP | 275W | 175W | 275W | 250W |
| Power Connectors | Dual 8-Pin | 8-Pin | Dual 8-Pin | 6+8 Pin |
| GFLOPS/Watt | 31.3 | 42 (TBC) | 26.2 | 22.4 |
| Launch Price | $649 | TBA | $549 | $549 |
| Launch Date | June 24 2015 | August 2015 | July 10 2015 | October 24 2013 |
*Table courtesy of WCCF Tech
Thanks to iyd.kr, we also have some Unigine Heaven benchmark results to report, and they’re promising indeed.
You’ll have to look close to see the results, but the gist of it is that the R9 Nano is more than twice as fast as the R9 290X.
These numbers aren’t to be taken lightly, especially when the Nano scores (according to WCCF Tech) around 26.6 fps in a 4K benchmark. Just don’t take them as guaranteed just yet.
Come the Nano’s release in August, we can’t wait to see the sort of performance compact PCs will manage.
Source: WCCF Tech, KitGuru, Feature image courtesy of iyd.kr
In other related news
NVIDIA’s GP100 Pascal GPUs to feature 4-Hi HBM2 and a 4096-bit memory bus
The ultimate 4K showdown: Radeon R9 Fury X Quad Crossfire vs. Titan X Quad SLI
Samsung developing 11K display for mobile devices
Forum discussion



Join the conversation